<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mister Reiner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A blog about computer security, hacking and just about anything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Book by sue</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/the-book/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?page_id=13#comment-926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read your book, Interesting, agree with you, thank you. Couple of typos loose instead of lose and port 23 and 22 wrong way around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read your book, Interesting, agree with you, thank you. Couple of typos loose instead of lose and port 23 and 22 wrong way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows will never be secure because of major design flaws by Mohammed Khaled</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/windows-design-flaws/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammed Khaled]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 01:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=928#comment-859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we need to find a 90% Secure, 95% Functionality, 94% Ease of use OS.

Linux is not compatible with a normal consumer from useability standpoint; &quot;made to do special purposes&quot;.

As you said Mr. Mister Reiner, windows also is not compatible with a normal consumer from Security&#039;s standpoint.

As a normal user I can say that widows 7 achieved my requirements.

Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to find a 90% Secure, 95% Functionality, 94% Ease of use OS.</p>
<p>Linux is not compatible with a normal consumer from useability standpoint; &#8220;made to do special purposes&#8221;.</p>
<p>As you said Mr. Mister Reiner, windows also is not compatible with a normal consumer from Security&#8217;s standpoint.</p>
<p>As a normal user I can say that widows 7 achieved my requirements.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows will never be secure because of major design flaws by Mohammed Khaled</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/windows-design-flaws/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammed Khaled]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 01:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=928#comment-858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Jim,

Linux is a bit far from the &#039;Ease Of Use&#039; of Windows {Talking from the normal user standpoint}, hope that you will check this out.

http://blog.infosanity.co.uk/?s=functionality%2Fease+of+use]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jim,</p>
<p>Linux is a bit far from the &#8216;Ease Of Use&#8217; of Windows {Talking from the normal user standpoint}, hope that you will check this out.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.infosanity.co.uk/?s=functionality%2Fease+of+use" rel="nofollow">http://blog.infosanity.co.uk/?s=functionality%2Fease+of+use</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android&#8217;s permissions model provides no protection against covert spyware by Mister Reiner</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/androids-permissions-model/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mister Reiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=2951#comment-429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s easy. Making the app free makes it even easier. The big challenge is convincing people to download the app. If you can find an unattended phone that isn&#039;t secured, you can install something very quickly and the owner may never notice that a rogue application is installed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy. Making the app free makes it even easier. The big challenge is convincing people to download the app. If you can find an unattended phone that isn&#8217;t secured, you can install something very quickly and the owner may never notice that a rogue application is installed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android&#8217;s permissions model provides no protection against covert spyware by ivexfec</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/androids-permissions-model/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivexfec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=2951#comment-428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Keep in mind, however, that a clever programmer can obfuscate his hidden intent by convincing a user that a feature requires certain permissions, which in a weird way make sense, but are not necessary for the application to function.&quot;
How much is it possible?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Keep in mind, however, that a clever programmer can obfuscate his hidden intent by convincing a user that a feature requires certain permissions, which in a weird way make sense, but are not necessary for the application to function.&#8221;<br />
How much is it possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac OS X versus Windows Security: Let&#8217;s just call it even by Mac vs Windows — Geeks to the Rescue</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/09/01/mac-os-x-versus-windows-security/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac vs Windows — Geeks to the Rescue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=3460#comment-419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This rareness has both a positive and a negative effect though. Viruses are difficult to write because they exploit quite complex loopholes in an operating system or associated support software. Because discovering these loopholes takes a lot of time and research, it makes sense to concentrate on the most popular platform in order for the virus writer to get the most &#8220;bang&#8221; for his &#8220;buck&#8221;. So the positive is that because Macs are rare, virus and spyware aren&#8217;t created for them (it is often said that Macs don&#8217;t get viruses because they are inherently more secure than Windows, but security analysts would say, &#8220;Let’s just call it even&#8220;). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This rareness has both a positive and a negative effect though. Viruses are difficult to write because they exploit quite complex loopholes in an operating system or associated support software. Because discovering these loopholes takes a lot of time and research, it makes sense to concentrate on the most popular platform in order for the virus writer to get the most &#8220;bang&#8221; for his &#8220;buck&#8221;. So the positive is that because Macs are rare, virus and spyware aren&#8217;t created for them (it is often said that Macs don&#8217;t get viruses because they are inherently more secure than Windows, but security analysts would say, &#8220;Let’s just call it even&#8220;). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why anti-malware software doesn&#8217;t always work by Researching antivirus for my pc - Computers -PCs, laptops, hardware, software - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/why-anti-malware-software-doesnt-always-work/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Researching antivirus for my pc - Computers -PCs, laptops, hardware, software - City-Data Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=1943#comment-418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox vulnerabilities give me the creeps! by bhalley</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/09/08/firefox-vulnerabilities-give-me-the-creeps/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bhalley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=3566#comment-417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using Opera for the last 3+ years.  I tried Firefox and didn&#039;t like it.  I want a browser with no pop-ups and with Opera it has been a joy.  I had to work on a computer last week whee the user got a pop-up about an update for AVG and they clicked on than AVG went crazy with alerts because of the malware that was trying to install.  I do have to go to Firefox for some web apps that don&#039;t work under Opera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Opera for the last 3+ years.  I tried Firefox and didn&#8217;t like it.  I want a browser with no pop-ups and with Opera it has been a joy.  I had to work on a computer last week whee the user got a pop-up about an update for AVG and they clicked on than AVG went crazy with alerts because of the malware that was trying to install.  I do have to go to Firefox for some web apps that don&#8217;t work under Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Motorola&#8217;s Droid X eFuse is a good thing by Mister Reiner</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/efuse/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mister Reiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=2243#comment-413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not like the phone will stop working...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not like the phone will stop working&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Motorola&#8217;s Droid X eFuse is a good thing by T.Osinubi</title>
		<link>http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/efuse/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.Osinubi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterreiner.wordpress.com/?p=2243#comment-412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what happens when Motorola decides not upgrade the Droid X to Android 3.0? So now you have all you have a nice 1GHZ papaer weight? Obviously destined for some landfill, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happens when Motorola decides not upgrade the Droid X to Android 3.0? So now you have all you have a nice 1GHZ papaer weight? Obviously destined for some landfill, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
